Welcome!

Wireless Authors: Liz McMillan, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Lori MacVittie, Elizabeth White

News Feed Item

LBS Platforms and Technologies - 4th Edition

NEW YORK, Nov. 29, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

 

LBS Platforms and Technologies – 4th Edition

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0209446/LBS-Platforms-and-Technologies-–-4th-Edition.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=IT_Services

 

Executive summary

 

Location platforms comprise software and hardware extensions to network infrastructure components that together can calculate the position of a handset. Mobile location platforms enable three categories of location-based services (LBS): public safety services, national security and law enforcement applications, as well as commercial LBS. Nearly 70 percent of all emergency calls are today placed from mobile phones and it can often be difficult for the caller to convey their location accurately to first responders. Location platforms can reduce the time to find the location of the caller. They also enable more efficient handling of simultaneous calls from people reporting the same incident to distinguish single accidents from multiple events. Another use case is public warning systems that can locate and send messages to all mobile users within a geo-fenced area. Government agencies can also use location platforms and data mining systems for critical infrastructure protection and locationenhanced lawful intercept.

 

Location technologies can be divided into handset-based technologies (such as GPS) with intelligence mainly in the handset, network-based technologies (for instance Cell-ID, RF Pattern Matching and U-TDOA) with intelligence mainly in the network, as well as hybrid technologies (for instance A-GPS) with intelligence in both the handset and the network. Several new hybrid location technologies are in development, aiming to improve the performance of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) in difficult environments. If not enough satellites are visible, it is for instance possible to fuse GNSS measurements with other network signals and data from inertial sensors to calculate the position. In pure indoor environments where GNSS is unavailable, the most common location technologies rely on Wi-Fi location using RF Pattern Matching or multilateration, augmented with data from sensors in the handset such as accelerometer, gyroscope, compass and barometer. The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) E911 mandates for location of mobile emergency calls released in 1996 was a major driver behind the development of location platforms for the North American market. In Europe, as well as in other developed countries such as Japan and South Korea, early deployments of location platforms focused on supporting commercial services due to the lack of a clear mandate for emergency services. In the first deployment phase, lasting from 2000 to 2003, operators invested in platforms and ready-made services.

 

Overall, the results did not live up to the expectations in terms of uptake or usage and many operators therefore lost interest in LBS as a mass-market proposition. A majority of commercial LBS now use location data obtained directly from GPS receivers and Wi-Fi chipsets in the handset, or various third party location databases, rather than directly from operators using network-based location. Mobile operators are however showing increasing interest in using mass location data for advertising and marketing, as well as new services like analytics. Moreover, governments and telecom regulators worldwide are now introducing emergency call and lawful intercept mandates that require at least basic location platforms. Although the regulators have typically not yet imposed any specific location accuracy requirements as part of the mandates, more stringent location accuracy may well be demanded in the future as technologies mature and costs decrease. A diverse set of players are now developing indoor location platforms to support use-cases ranging from emergency call location to navigation, shopping, analytics and marketing. The established location platform vendors and connectivity chipset vendors are extending their offerings to enable indoor location. In addition, a growing number of technology specialists and start-up companies are also introducing software or infrastructure solutions that enable handset vendors, app developers and enterprises to add indoor location capabilities to smartphones that are already on the market.

 

Berg Insight estimates that one third of all mobile network operators worldwide have deployed at least some type of basic location platform. Additional deployments and updates of existing platforms can be expected in most markets in the coming years, primarily driven by government mandates, but also by new mass location applications such as advertising and analytics. Berg Insight forecasts that total global annual revenues for GMLC/MPC, SMLC/PDE, SUPL A-GNSS and probe-based location systems will grow from € 180 million in 2011 to € 330 million in 2017. These revenues comprise integration fees and licenses for new platform deployments, as well as capacity and technology upgrades, maintenance and associated services.

 

 

Table of Contents

 

Executive summary.1

1 Introduction to location platforms3

1.1 Location platforms and location-based services.3

1.1.1 Overview of mobile location platforms4

1.1.2 A brief history of location platforms and services .4

1.2 Mobile communication services6

1.2.1 Mobile voice and data subscribers .7

1.2.2 Mobile voice and SMS service revenues 8

1.2.3 Mobile data and application revenues 8

1.2.4 Location apps and service revenues 9

1.3 Mobile location platforms and technologies .10

1.3.1 Mobile location platforms10

1.3.2 Mobile location technologies 11

1.3.3 Location middleware.13

1.4 The mobile LBS value chain14

1.4.1 Location technology developers and platform vendors .14

1.4.2 Connectivity chipset vendors 15

1.4.3 LBS middleware vendors 16

1.4.4 Indoor location solution providers 16

1.4.5 Mobile network operators .17

1.4.6 Location aggregators and database providers.17

1.4.7 Smartphone platform and handset vendors .18

1.4.8 Mobile application developers and service providers 18

1.5 Telecoms regulations drive location platform deployments .19

1.5.1 European emergency call and privacy regulations 19

1.5.2 LBS regulatory environment in the US21

1.5.3 Emergency call regulations in Australia23

1.5.4 Emergency call regulations in Canada .23

1.5.5 The Indian Department of Telecommunications location mandate24

1.5.6 Emergency call regulations in Japan24

2 Technology overview.25

2.1 Mobile network location platforms 26

2.1.1 Location architecture for GSM/UMTS networks26

2.1.2 Location architecture for LTE networks 27

2.1.3 Location architecture and technologies in 3GPP2 networks28

2.1.4 Control Plane and User Plane location platforms .29

2.1.5 OMA SUPL 1.0 30

2.1.6 OMA SUPL 2.0 and SUPL 2.1 .30

2.1.7 OMA SUPL 3.0 32

2.1.8 Handset client and probe-based location platforms.33

2.1.9 Location in converged IP networks.34

2.2 Network-based positioning technologies35

2.2.1 Cell-ID35

2.2.2 Enhanced Cell-ID and RF Pattern Matching methods37

2.2.3 E-OTD and OTDOA.37

2.2.4 Uplink Time Difference of Arrival (U-TDOA) 38

2.2.5 Bluetooth and Wi-Fi positioning40

2.3 GNSS and hybrid location technologies .41

2.3.1 GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Compass .41

2.3.2 Assisted GPS and A-GNSS.44

2.3.3 Hybrid, mixed mode and indoor location technologies46

2.4 Comparison of location technologies47

2.4.1 Network-based location technologies.48

2.4.2 Handset-based and hybrid location technologies49

2.4.3 Location technologies in development .50

3 Location technology market trends.51

3.1 Multiple parallel efforts drive location technology development.51

3.1.1 Emergency call location and public safety .51

3.1.2 Location-enhanced lawful intercept and national security52

3.1.3 Consumer and enterprise LBS and apps53

3.1.4 Commercial indoor location services55

3.1.5 Mobile marketing and advertising.56

3.1.6 Fraud management and secure authentication56

3.2 Smartphone ecosystems.57

3.2.1 Smartphone platform market shares 59

3.2.2 Smartphone platforms transform into new vertical silos.60

3.2.3 Towards a complete LBS stack 60

4 Commercial deployments61

4.1 Platform deployments in Europe.62

4.1.1 3 Group .65

4.1.2 Deutsche Telekom Group .65

4.1.3 KPN Group 66

4.1.4 Orange Group .66

4.1.5 SFR67

4.1.6 Telecom Italia Mobile 68

4.1.7 Telefónica Group.68

4.1.8 Telenor Group .69

4.1.9 TeliaSonera Group 70

4.1.10 Vodafone Group71

4.2 Platform deployments in the Americas72

4.2.1 AT&T Mobility 74

4.2.2 Bell Mobility .74

4.2.3 Rogers Wireless 75

4.2.4 Sprint Nextel 75

4.2.5 TELUS .75

4.2.6 Verizon Wireless76

4.2.7 Wind Mobile.76

4.3 Platform deployments in Asia-Pacific 76

4.3.1 BSNL .78

4.3.2 China Mobile .78

4.3.3 NTT DoCoMo 78

4.3.4 Telstra79

4.3.5 Telkomsel 79

4.4 Platform deployments in ROW80

5 Market forecasts and trends 81

5.1 LBS market trends .81

5.1.1 Emergency call mandates remain the key driver for platform deployments 82

5.1.2 Location-enabled lawful intercept .82

5.1.3 Location-based services revenue forecast .83

5.2 Handset market trends 84

5.2.1 GNSS attach rates driven by higher smartphone sales85

5.2.2 GNSS-enabled handset shipment forecasts by segment.86

5.3 Location platform deployments.87

5.3.1 Vendor market shares .87

5.3.2 GMLC/MPC and SMLC/PDE platform deployment forecasts.88

5.3.3 SUPL A-GPS server deployment forecast.90

5.3.4 Location middleware deployment forecast.92

6 Location platform and technology vendor profiles93

6.1 Location platform and infrastructure vendors .93

6.1.1 Alcatel-Lucent95

6.1.2 CommScope .96

6.1.3 Creativity Software.97

6.1.4 Ericsson.98

6.1.5 GBSD Technologies99

6.1.6 Intersec100

6.1.7 Mobile Arts 101

6.1.8 Nokia Siemens Networks 103

6.1.9 Oksijen.103

6.1.10 Persistent Systems104

6.1.11 Polaris Wireless .105

6.1.12 Redknee 106

6.1.13 Septier .106

6.1.14 TeleCommunication Systems .107

6.1.15 TruePosition 109

6.2 Location middleware vendors .111

6.2.1 Aepona 111

6.2.2 CellVision.112

6.2.3 Genasys 113

6.2.4 Mobilaris 114

6.2.5 Reach-U.115

6.2.6 Telenity 116

6.3 GNSS chipset and assistance server vendors 118

6.3.1 Broadcom120

6.3.2 CSR .121

6.3.3 Qualcomm.122

6.3.4 Rx Networks 123

6.4 Client-based location platforms, aggregators and databases125

6.4.1 Apigee .125

6.4.2 Combain Mobile 126

6.4.3 Geoloqi127

6.4.4 Locaid127

6.4.5 Location Labs128

6.4.6 Navizon130

6.4.7 Skyhook Wireless131

6.5 Indoor location technology developers.132

6.5.1 Boeing .132

6.5.2 ByteLight .134

6.5.3 Cisco Systems.134

6.5.4 GloPos.135

6.5.5 IndoorAtlas 136

6.5.6 Insiteo 137

6.5.7 Nearbuy Systems138

6.5.8 NextNav.138

6.5.9 Nokia .139

6.5.10 Point Inside140

6.5.11 Pole Star 140

6.5.12 Qubulus.141

6.5.13 SenionLab .141

6.5.14 Walkbase.142

6.5.15 Wifarer .143

6.5.16 WiFiSLAM 144

Glossary 145

 

List of Figures

 

Figure 1.1: Wireless cellular subscribers by standard (World Q2-2012)6

Figure 1.2: Mobile subscriptions by region (World Q2-2012) 7

Figure 1.3: Wireless service revenues (World 2011) 9

Figure 1.4: Mobile location system overview10

Figure 1.5: Overview of the LBS value chain 15

Figure 2.1: Location architecture overview.27

Figure 2.2: Location Information Server in converged IP networks .34

Figure 2.3: Cellular frequency reuse pattern 35

Figure 2.4: Cell-ID location methods 36

Figure 2.5: U-TDOA location.39

Figure 2.6: Assisted GPS technologies 45

Figure 2.7: Performance and limiting factors for network-based location technologies47

Figure 2.8: Performance and limiting factors for hybrid location technologies49

Figure 3.1: Smartphone adoption by region (World 2010–2012).57

Figure 3.2: Smartphone shipments by vendor and OS (World H1-2012) 58

Figure 4.1: Location infrastructure and technology vendor customer references .61

Figure 4.2: Location infrastructure deployments in Europe .62

Figure 4.3: Location infrastructure deployments in the Americas72

Figure 4.4: Location infrastructure deployments in Asia-Pacific 77

Figure 4.5: Location infrastructure deployments in ROW.80

Figure 5.1: Emergency and commercial LBS revenue forecast (World 2011–2017) .83

Figure 5.2: Handset shipment forecast by segment (World 2010–2016).84

Figure 5.3: GNSS-enabled handset shipment forecast by segment (World 2010–2016) 86

Figure 5.4: Location infrastructure vendor market shares (World 2012)87

Figure 5.5: Location platform revenues (World 2011–2017) 88

Figure 6.1: Location infrastructure and technology vendors93

Figure 6.2: Location infrastructure and technology product offerings by vendor94

Figure 6.3: Major location middleware vendors .111

Figure 6.4: Examples of GNSS chipset and assistance server developers .118

Figure 6.5: Location aggregators and client-based location platform developers.125

Figure 6.6: Overview of indoor location technologies by vendor.133

 

 

 

To order this report:

IT_Services Industry: LBS Platforms and Technologies – 4th Edition

 

Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: [email protected]
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

 

SOURCE Reportlinker

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.